Abstract

Fishery-independent surveys, such as bottom trawl surveys, provide time-series abundance estimates, which inform many modern stock assessments. Area-swept biomass estimates from trawl surveys assume that fish densities do not differ between trawlable (T) and untrawlable (UT) areas. Bias and imprecision in the biomass estimates can occur when this assumption is not met. Thus, reliable estimates are needed for both the extent of T and UT habitat types in the surveyed area, and the relative densities of the fish species in the two habitat types to accurately assess groundfish populations. Acoustics and stereo-camera survey tools were used in the present study to determine the extent of T and UT habitat within 25-km2 bottom trawl survey grid cells historically designated as T/UT. Splitbeam acoustics were used to compare the abundance of rockfishes (Sebastes spp.) between the T/UT grid cell areas. Acoustic data were collected along uniformly spaced transects within 52 T and 43 UT grid cells throughout the Gulf of Alaska during summers 2013, 2015, and 2017. The acoustic backscatter attributed to rockfishes in UT grid cells was approximately three times that in T cells, and the percentages available to the bottom trawl survey were 40 % for harlequin rockfish, 43 % for northern rockfish, 51 % for dusky rockfish, and 98 % for Pacific ocean perch (POP). These findings allowed for estimation of the trawl catchability coefficient (q; a scaler between estimates of the area-swept survey abundance and actual abundance) of 0.46 for harlequin rockfish, 0.50 for northern rockfish, and 0.64 for dusky rockfish, and 1.15 for POP. These values could be used to inform the relationship between trawl survey estimated and actual abundances of rockfishes to improve the accuracy of stock assessments for these species.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call