Abstract

Both badgers and livestock movements have been implicated in contributing to the ongoing epidemic of bovine tuberculosis (BTB) in British cattle. However, the relative contributions of these and other causes are not well quantified. We used cattle movement data to construct an individual (premises)-based model of BTB spread within Great Britain, accounting for spread due to recorded cattle movements and other causes. Outbreak data for 2004 were best explained by a model attributing 16% of herd infections directly to cattle movements, and a further 9% unexplained, potentially including spread from unrecorded movements. The best-fit model assumed low levels of cattle-to-cattle transmission. The remaining 75% of infection was attributed to local effects within specific high-risk areas. Annual and biennial testing is mandatory for herds deemed at high risk of infection, as is pre-movement testing from such herds. The herds identified as high risk in 2004 by our model are in broad agreement with those officially designated as such at that time. However, border areas at the edges of high-risk regions are different, suggesting possible areas that should be targeted to prevent further geographical spread of disease. With these areas expanding rapidly over the last decade, their close surveillance is important to both identify infected herds quickly, and limit their further growth.

Highlights

  • Bovine tuberculosis (BTB) control in Great Britain (GB) cost over £90 million in 2005 including £35 million in compensation to cattle farmers

  • MATERIAL AND METHODS We use cattle tracing system (CTS) data provided by RADAR, details of bovine tuberculosis (BTB) breakdowns reported to DEFRA’s animal health database, VetNet, and the June Agricultural Survey for 2003 as detailed in the electronic supplementary material

  • Our results suggest that attribution of risk by areas centred on breakdown herds in 2003 would have identified 0.5% more of BTB-infected herds in 2004, reducing the infected herds not in these areas by 20%

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Bovine tuberculosis (BTB) control in Great Britain (GB) cost over £90 million in 2005 including £35 million in compensation to cattle farmers (http://www.defra.gov.uk/ animalh/tb/stats/expenditure.htm). While recent changes in government policy have introduced tuberculin testing for cattle prior to movement from herds deemed at high risk (http://www.defra.gov.uk/animalh/tb/pdf/pre-movement test.pdf ), the relative importance of cattle movements remains to be assessed. Movements of infected cattle have been shown to pose a clear transmission risk (Goodchild & Clifton-Hadley 2001; Gopal et al 2006), and cattle movements are a significant predictor of the distribution of BTB (Gilbert et al 2005). In some high-risk areas of GB, M. bovis is widespread in badgers (Gallagher & Clifton-Hadley 2000; de la Rua-Domenech et al 2006), and they are implicated

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call