Abstract

Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) and mupirocin are widely used to decolonize patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and reduce risks associated with infection in hospitalized populations. Quantifying the association of an application of CHG alone or in combination with mupirocin with risk of MRSA infection is important for studies evaluating alternative decolonization strategies or schedules and for identifying whether there is room for improved decolonizing agents. To estimate the proportion of patients with MRSA decolonized per application of CHG and mupirocin from existing population-level studies. A stochastic mathematical model of an 18-bed intensive care unit (ICU) in an academic medical center operating over 1 year was used to estimate parameters for the proportion of simulated patients with MRSA decolonized per application of CHG and mupirocin. The model was conducted using approximate bayesian computation with data from an existing meta-analysis of studies conducted from February 2005 through January 2015. Data were analyzed from January 2018 through November 2019. A universal decolonization protocol for colonized patients in the ICU using CHG or CHG and mupirocin in combination was simulated. The proportion of patients with MRSA decolonized per application of CHG and mupirocin was estimated. The estimated proportion of patients with MRSA decolonized per application of CHG was 0.15 (95% credible interval, 0.01-0.42), and the estimated proportion per application of mupirocin in conjunction with CHG was 0.15 (95% credible interval, 0.01-0.54). A lag in colonization detection was associated with decreases in the CHG estimate (0.11; 95% credible interval, 0.01-0.30) and mupirocin estimate (0.10; 95% credible interval, 0.00-0.34), which were sensitive to the value of the modeled contact rate between nurses and patients. A 1% increase in the value of this parameter was associated with a 0.73% increase in the estimated combined outcomes associated with CHG and mupirocin (95% CI: 0.71, 0.75). Gaps longer than 24 hours in the administration of decolonizing agents were associated with a decrease of within-ICU MRSA transmission. Compared with a mean (SD) of 1.23 (0.27) acquisitions per 1000 patient-days in scenarios with no decolonizing bathing, a bathing protocol administering CHG and mupirocin every 120 hours was associated with a mean (SD) acquisition rate of 1.03 (0.24) acquisitions per 1000 patient days, a 16.3% decrease (95% CI, 14.7%-18.0%; P > .001). These findings suggest that there may be room for significant improvement in anti-MRSA disinfectants, including the compounds themselves and their delivery mechanisms. Despite the decolonization estimates found in this study, these agents are associated with robust outcomes after delays in administration, which may help in alleviating concerns over patient comfort and toxic effects.

Highlights

  • Despite recent progress in decreased incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in hospitals,[1] it remains a targeted pathogen for infection prevention and public health efforts

  • The estimated proportion of patients with MRSA decolonized per application of chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) was 0.15 (95% credible interval, 0.01-0.42), and the estimated proportion per application of mupirocin in conjunction with CHG was 0.15 (95% credible interval, 0.01-0.54)

  • Compared with a mean (SD) of 1.23 (0.27) acquisitions per 1000 patient-days in scenarios with no decolonizing bathing, a bathing protocol administering CHG and mupirocin every 120 hours was associated with a mean (SD) acquisition rate of 1.03 (0.24) acquisitions per 1000 patient days, a 16.3% decrease

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Despite recent progress in decreased incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in hospitals,[1] it remains a targeted pathogen for infection prevention and public health efforts. The results from the randomized clinical trial may not generalize well to settings with lower MRSA incidence or with differing levels of mupirocin resistance. Lower-incidence settings may not be sufficiently powered to detect an association between implementing decolonization programs and decolonization outcomes. Changes in implementation from the trial setting to everyday use may be associated with decreases in the overall outcome of the intervention. Infection prevention programs considering these strategies in lower-incidence settings must justify the cost of decolonization products and implementation efforts in their hospitals. A better understanding of outcomes associated with the per-patient application level may help programs weigh the implementation costs of these interventions

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call