Abstract
The relative importance of terrestrial and epiphytic establishment of the emergent tree Metrosideros robusta (Myrtaceae) and its host tree species and sizes, were surveyed in seven different forest types with different disturbance histories in northern New Zealand. At two disturbed sites, M. robusta established terrestrially. At less disturbed sites, most M. robusta were hemi‐epiphytic, but terrestrially established individuals had colonised occasional canopy gaps. M. robusta occurred more commonly on large host trees (>50 cm diameter) than either relative density or relative basal area of host trees would predict, suggesting that large trees are intrinsically better places to establish and not just bigger targets. M. robusta grew on 20 of the 42 tree species sampled. Vitex lucens, dead trees, and the podocarps Dacrydium cupressinum, Dacrycarpus dacrydioides, and Prumnopitys ferruginea were more common as hosts than their relative densities predicted at all sites where they were present. Other host species such as Podocarpus hallii and Laurelia novae‐zelandiae were “preferred” at some sites, but not at others. M. robusta tended to establish in different sites on different host tree species. Hauturu (Little Barrier Island), where the Australian brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) has never been present, had the highest number of saplings and fewest dead M. robusta, suggesting that this introduced browser is changing the size structure of mainland New Zealand M. robusta populations.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.