Abstract

Minimum soil disturbance and increased crop residue retention practices are promising options to enhance soil organic matter, nutrient concentration and crop yield. However, the potentials of the practices in improving soil properties, increasing crop yield and in ensuring economic return have not been tested in the monsoon rice (Oryza sativa L.)-lentil (Lens culinaris L.)/wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)-jute (Corchorus culinaris L.) cropping systems on seasonally flooded lowlands of the Eastern Gangetic Plain of South Asia. A field trial for consecutive three years was conducted in the Gangetic Plains of Bangladesh to evaluate the effects of zero tillage (ZT), strip-tillage (ST), bed planting (BP) and conventional tillage (CT) with two residue retention levels (RL—a low level similar to current farmers’ practice and RH—increased retention) on soil properties, yield and economic return. Between rice and jute crops, lentil was grown for the 1st and 2nd years and wheat for the 3rd year during the dry winter season. The ST and BP performed better than the CT and ZT in terms of yield of rice and lentil, whereas ST and ZT performed better than other practices in the case of jute. Higher residue retention (RH) increased crop yield for all the years. The highest rice equivalent yield (sum of 3 crop yields, expressed as rice yield) and the greatest benefit-cost ratio (BCR) were recorded with ST and RH. The increased yield in the ST was associated with reduced soil bulk density (BD), while ST with RH increased soil water (SW) and decreased penetration resistance (PR) of soil. Compared to CT, minimum soil disturbance of ZT and ST increased soil organic matter (SOM) stock by 24% and 23%, respectively; total nitrogen (TN) by 23.5% and 18.4%, respectively; extractable sulphur (S) by 21% and 18%, respectively; whereas Zinc (Zn) concentrations increased by 53% and 47%, respectively, in the upper 0–5 cm soil depth. Accumulation of extractable P, S and Zn in the 0–5 cm depth of soil followed the sequence as ZT > ST > BP > CT practice. The higher amount of residue retention significantly increased SOM, TN and extractable P, K, S and Zn concentrations at 0–5 cm and 5–10 cm soil depths. The 3-year study suggests that ST with RH is a potential crop management approach for the seasonally flooded rice-lentil/wheat-jute cropping systems to enhance soil nutrients status, crop yield and farm economy.

Highlights

  • Fitting novel rice (Oryza sativa L.) establishment practices in the wetland rice–upland crop intensive cropping systems has always been a challenge

  • To fit conservation agriculture (CA) in rice-based triple cropping systems, puddling has been replaced by direct seeding of rice, but they have their own demerits for the timeliness, labour use, water productivity, input requirement, drudgery, fuel consumption, energy use, yield sacrifice, economic return and GHG fluxes [3,4,5]

  • In the 2nd and 3rd years, the highest grain yield was observed in ST practice and bed planting (BP) had a significantly similar yield to ST

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Fitting novel rice (Oryza sativa L.) establishment practices in the wetland rice–upland crop intensive cropping systems has always been a challenge. To fit conservation agriculture (CA) in rice-based triple cropping systems, puddling has been replaced by direct seeding of rice (dry, wet and water seeding), but they have their own demerits for the timeliness, labour use, water productivity, input requirement, drudgery, fuel consumption, energy use, yield sacrifice, economic return and GHG fluxes [3,4,5]. A novel solution to overcome these problems can be non–puddled rice crop establishment practice which, in some environments and soils, has been reported to perform well in terms of yield increase, soil properties improvement, global warming mitigation and economic return [2,5,7,8,9]. More research is needed in diversified soils and cropping systems to showcase the potentials of CA cropping so that farmers, as well as policymakers, see the merits of adopting CA cropping in the Eastern Gangetic Plains (EGP)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call