Abstract

The present experiment was designed to determine whether classical eyeblink conditioning (EBC) can be established by using electrical microstimulation of the hippocampus as a conditioned stimulus (CS) paired with an air-puff unconditioned stimulus (US). We intended to examine whether EBC transfer could occur when a CS was shifted between microstimulation of the hippocampus as a CS (Hip-CS) and tone as a CS (tone-CS) and to compare the difference in transfer effectiveness between delay EBC (dEBC) and trace EBC (tEBC). Eight groups of guinea pigs, including 4 experimental groups and 4 control groups, were included in the study. First, the experimental groups received either a Hip-CS or a tone-CS paired with a US; then, these groups were exposed to a shifted CS (tone-CS or Hip-CS) paired with the US. The control groups received the corresponding Hip-CS or tone-CS, which was, however, pseudo-paired with the US. The control groups were then shifted to the tone-CS (or Hip-CS) paired with the US. The results show that EBC can be successfully established when using microstimulation of the hippocampus as a CS paired with an air-puff US, and that the acquisition rates of EBC are higher in the experimental groups than in the control groups after switching from the Hip-CS to the tone-CS or vice versa, indicating the occurrence of learning transfer between EBC established with the Hip-CS and tone-CS. The present study also demonstrated that the EBC re-acquisition rates were remarkably higher in dEBC than in tEBC with both types of transfer, which suggests that the saving effect was more evident in dEBC than tEBC. These results significantly expand our knowledge of EBC transfer as well as the functional neural circuit underlying EBC transfer.

Highlights

  • For a long time, electrical microstimulation of specific brain regions has been used to provide information about the functions of brain structures related to specific behaviors

  • The results show that eyeblink conditioning (EBC) can be successfully established when using microstimulation of the hippocampus as a conditioned stimulus (CS) paired with an air-puff unconditioned stimulus (US), and that the acquisition rates of EBC are higher in the experimental groups than in the control groups after switching from the Hip-CS to the tone as a CS (tone-CS) or vice versa, indicating the occurrence of learning transfer between EBC established with the Hip-CS and tone-CS

  • The present study has shown that microstimulation of the hippocampus as a CS paired with a US is sufficient to establish delay EBC (dEBC) and trace EBC (tEBC) in guinea pigs and that the establishment of tEBC with Hip-CS is slower than that of dEBC, which is in agreement with previous studies using peripheral CS to establish EBC [41, 42]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Electrical microstimulation of specific brain regions has been used to provide information about the functions of brain structures related to specific behaviors. Little is known about the transfer effect when a CS is shifted from hippocampal stimulation (if it is a sufficient CS to support EBC) to peripheral stimulation or vice versa as well as the difference in learning transfer between dEBC and tEBC. Been found in a variety of memory tasks [38], the present study aimed to achieve the following goals: (1) to determine whether microstimulation of the hippocampus is a sufficient CS to support EBC; (2) to observe whether transfer of EBC learning can occur when a CS is shifted between microstimulation of the hippocampus and that of the peripheral stimulus; and (3) to compare the difference in transfer effectiveness between the two paradigms, dEBC and tEBC. The physical health of the animals were monitored and assessed twice a day by observing and measuring their locomotion, respiration, food-intake and mental conditions

Behavioral procedures
Results
Discussion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call