Abstract

Study regionThe five drainage systems of the Congo River Basin in central Africa. Study focusThis study aims to establish uncertainty ranges of hydrologic indices and to provide a basis for transferring hydrologic indices from gauged to ungauged sub-basins by identifying the most influential climate and physiographic attributes. New insights for this regionOnly limited information on individual sub-basins natural hydrology exists across the Congo River Basin, limiting the application of commonly used regionalization approaches for prediction in ungauged sub-basins. This study uses predictive equations for the hydrologic indices across all climate and physiographic regions based only on the aridity index. The degree of uncertainty in the derived uncertainty bounds is less than 41% for both Q10/MMQ and Q50/MMQ indices across the basin. A greater degree of uncertainty is associated with the runoff ratio and the Q90/MMQ indices. The uncertainty is assumed to be due to uncertainty in rainfall and evapotranspiration estimates, a lack of spatial representativeness of the available observed streamflow data and other factors (e.g., geology) that might control the hydrologic indices rather than the aridity index alone. The uncertainty ranges provide the first estimates of hydrologic indices that are intended to constrain the outputs from hydrologic models and appropriately quantify prediction uncertainty and risks associated with water resources decision making.

Highlights

  • Hydrologic indices or signatures are the characteristics of a sub-basin’s long-term hydrologic behavior

  • It is a common practice in hydrology to use catchment classification as a means of extending hydrologic information from gauged to ungauged sub-basins

  • The classification of the 403 sub-basins of the Congo River (Fig. 5 and Table 5) demonstrated that the climate and physiographic attributes used in this study can identify relatively homogeneous regions, suggesting that there is a potential to interpret hydrologic similarity based on similarity in climate and physiography (Oudin et al, 2010; Ley et al, 2011)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hydrologic indices or signatures are the characteristics of a sub-basin’s long-term hydrologic behavior. They reflect the dynamics of the different components of the catchment water balance such as climate, water storage and different runoff processes. Olden and Poff (2003) provide a large range of possible indices These include the flow distribution, event frequency and duration, flow dynamics, rainfall-runoff ratio and rainfall, and other climate-based indices. The flow dynamics include the slope of the normalized flow duration curve (Yadav et al, 2007), overall flow variability, the base flow (Clausen and Biggs, 2000), low and high-flow variability and flow autocorrelation (Euser et al, 2013). Westerberg et al (2016) used 15 hydrologic signatures including 9 for flow distribution (flow percentiles) and 6 for flow dynamics (base flow index, coefficient of variability in streamflow, etc...) for hydrologic similarity. Zhang et al (2018) used 13 runoff signatures including 3 for low flows, 1 for high flows, 4 for mean annual and mean seasonal flows and 5 for flow dynamics for assessing prediction accuracy in ungauged sub-basins

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call