Abstract

Inflow performance relationship (IPR) accuracy in the condensate reservoir is a long-standing problem in the oil industry. This paper presents a new approach to project the gas phase IPR in condensate reservoirs. IPR is estimated by Rawlins and Schellhardt equation whereas the gas pseudo-pressure function is solved by two methods and the results are compared. Both two pseudo-pressure equations are used to estimate IPR. Additionally, an average of both IPR’s is estimated and compared. At the reservoir pressure, the difference between both flow rates is negligible i.e. at 6750 psi, the flow rate difference is 0.55 MMSCF/D. As pressure declines the difference is increasing at one stage, it is observed approximately 15 MMSCF/D.

Highlights

  • The gas condensate reservoirs are difficult to predict due to its multiphase behavior

  • There is not much research conducted in the case of calculating gas phase Inflow Performance Relation (IPR) in a condensate reservoir

  • In the solution gas drive reservoir, two phase flow causes the curvature in IPR due to the reduction in the relative permeability of the oil phase with the depletion [2]

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The gas condensate reservoirs are difficult to predict due to its multiphase behavior. There is not much research conducted in the case of calculating gas phase IPR in a condensate reservoir. It is possible to calculate IPR by using gas phase pseudo-pressure function without using the relative permeability data. Pseudo-pressure equation is solved using effective permeability data which can be obtained by pressure buildup test [1]. In the solution gas drive reservoir, two phase flow causes the curvature in IPR due to the reduction in the relative permeability of the oil phase with the depletion [2]. The major cause of production loss is condensate blockage near the wellbore [6]. This paper provides key improvements in the calculation of gas phase pseudo-pressure function using the integral effective permeability technique proposed in [12]

Gas Pseudo-Pressure Function
Derivative of Gas Pseudo-Pressure Function
Integral of Effective Permeability
Gas Flow Rate for IPR
CONCLUDING INTERPRETATION
RECOMMENDATIONS
Figures and Tables
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.