Abstract

The increasing prevalence of mental health disorders and psychosocial distress among young people exceeds the capacity of mental health services. Social and systemic factors determine mental health as much as individual factors. To determine how best to address multi-level risk factors, we must first understand the distribution of risk. Previously, we have used psychometric methods applied to two epidemiologically-principled samples of people aged 14–24 to establish a robust, latent common mental distress (CMD) factor of depression and anxiety normally distributed across the population. This was linearly associated with suicidal thoughts and non-suicidal self-harm such that effective interventions to reduce CMD across the whole population could have a greater total benefit than those that focus on the minority with the most severe scores. In a randomised trial of mindfulness interventions in university students (the Mindful Student Study), we demonstrated a population-shift effect whereby the intervention group appeared resilient to a universal stressor. Given these findings, and in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, we argue that population-based interventions to reduce CMD are urgently required. To target all types of mental health determinants, these interventions must be multi-level. Careful design and evaluation, interdisciplinary work, and extensive local stakeholder involvement are crucial for these interventions to be effective.

Highlights

  • The increasing prevalence of mental health disorders and psychosocial distress among young people exceeds the capacity of mental health services

  • Studies throughout the world suggest that mental health disorders and psychosocial distress in this specific age group are rising [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]

  • The importance of multiple layers of development is considered in other theories, such as Krieger’s ecosocial approach or Dahlgren and Whitehead’s “rainbow” model of the determinants of health, each of which highlights the importance of a variety of influences ranging from an individual’s genes to overarching social structures and cultural norms [33,34]. These bio-psycho-social models are not limited to risk factors for poor mental health, ; they can help us to conceptualise resilience to stress as a result of the interaction between the individual and multiple reciprocating systems

Read more

Summary

Including Context as Well as Individual Risk and Resilience Factors

We know that the determinants of mental ill health are not just biological [20]. The importance of multiple layers of development is considered in other theories, such as Krieger’s ecosocial approach or Dahlgren and Whitehead’s “rainbow” model of the determinants of (ill) health, each of which highlights the importance of a variety of influences ranging from an individual’s genes to overarching social structures and cultural norms [33,34]. These bio-psycho-social models are not limited to risk factors for poor mental health, ; they can help us to conceptualise resilience to stress as a result of the interaction between the individual and multiple reciprocating systems. The COVID-19 pandemic is a stark reminder that most of the triggers for mental health disorders are psychosocial [64]

A Public Health Approach to Prevention
Density
Public
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call