Abstract

We present two cases of suspicious mammographic images that remained stable over long periods of time (44 and 24 months). The biopsies revealed infiltrating ductal carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ. In one case, the lesion consisted of a cluster of microcalcifications, while the other was characterized by architectural distortion. There are very few references to this subject in the literature. We conclude that all suspicious mammographic lesions should be biopsied, despite previous evidence suggesting their stability, even over long periods of time.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call