Abstract

Any is ultimately based on a specific conception of the subject under investigation. Marxism views literary scholarship as a function of social life which is subject in terms of both its existence and its development on social necessity. This has been and continues to be the basis for referring to the Marxist as a method. This is true to a certain extent. Since the Marxist views literature as a social phenomenon, it must be considered to be one of the methods. But in point of fact, the term sociological method is an extremely vague designation that can lead to methodological confusion, a term that we may even need to discard altogether. In essence, there really is no such thing as a method, nor can there be, since there are as many methods as there are sociologies. We know that there are idealistic systems of sociology, and they certainly cannot serve as the basis for the known as Marxist sociology. We could nam...

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call