Abstract
In this paper we develop a Structural Vector Autoregressive (SVAR) model of the global market for crude oil where the forward-looking expectations of oil traders are inferred from the financial markets. Thus, we replace the global proxy for above-ground crude oil inventories with the oil futures-spot spread. The latter is defined as the percent deviation of the oil futures price from the spot price of oil and it represents a measure of the convenience yield but expressed with an opposite sign. The following model provides an economic interpretation of the residual structural shock, namely the financial market shock. This is designed to capture an unanticipated change in the benet of holding crude oil inventories that is driven by financial incentives. We find evidence that financial market shocks have played an important role in explaining the surge of the real price of oil during the period 2003-2008. We also highlight the main interesting features of five structural oil market VAR models and their implied identification structures. In addition we propose a simple qualitative method to rank different oil market VAR models. The comparative analysis offers evidence that the oil futures-spot spread represents a proper measure to capture the forward-looking expectations of oil traders.%%%%This paper provides an analysis of the link between the global market for crude oil and oil futures risk premium at the aggregate level. It offers empirical evidence on whether the compensation for risk required by the speculators depends on the type of the structural shock of interest. Understanding the response of the risk premium to unexpected changes in the price of oil can be useful to address some research questions, among which: what is the relationship between crude oil risk premium and unexpected rise in the price of oil? On average, what should speculators expect to receive as a compensation for the risk they are taking on? This work is based on a Structural Vector Autoregressive (SVAR) model of the crude oil market. Two main results emerge. First, the impulse response analysis provides evidence of a negative relationship between the risk premium and the changes in the price of oil triggered by shocks to economic fundamentals. Second, this analysis shows that the historical decline of the risk premium can be modelled as a part of endogenous effect of the oil market driven shocks.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.