Abstract
Tato studie pojednĂĄvĂĄ o ideovĂŠm sporu, kterĂ˝ se odehrĂĄl na pĹelomu sedmdesĂĄtĂ˝ch a osmdesĂĄtĂ˝ch let minulĂŠho stoletĂ v prostĹedĂ ÄeskĂŠho katolickĂŠho exilu. TĂ˝kal se vedenĂ exilovĂŠho Äasopisu Studie, kterĂ˝ v ĹĂmÄ vydĂĄvala KĹesĹĽanskĂĄ akademie a jehoĹž hlavnĂm redaktorem byl knÄz Karel SkalickĂ˝ (narozen 1934). Ten svou liberĂĄlnĂ otevĹenostĂ vĹŻÄi autorĹŻm z Ĺad nekatolĂkĹŻ, vÄetnÄ bĂ˝valĂ˝ch komunistĹŻ, vzbudil odpor v konzervativnÄ smýťlejĂcĂ ÄĂĄsti katolickĂ˝ch exulantĹŻ v Äele s knÄzem Jaroslavem V. Polcem (1929-2004), a musel tak Äelit opakovanĂ˝m pokusĹŻm o svĂŠ odvolĂĄnĂ. Vzhledem k otevĹenĂŠmu charakteru StudiĂ se na obranu SkalickĂŠho postavila Ĺada osobnostĂ i z Ĺad nekatolickĂŠho exilu (Erazim KohĂĄk, VĂĄclav BÄlohradskĂ˝) a disentu v Äeskoslovensku (Josef ZvÄĹina). Spor, kterĂ˝ skonÄil vĂtÄzstvĂm SkalickĂŠho liberĂĄlnĂ linie, autor zasazuje do kontextu tehdejĹĄĂ debaty v celĂŠ katolickĂŠ cĂrkvi nad interpretacĂ reforem DruhĂŠho vatikĂĄnskĂŠho koncilu.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
