Abstract

Whether or not an external force can make a trapped particle escape from optical tweezers can be used to measure optical forces. Combined with the linear dependence of optical forces on trapping power, a quantitative measurement of the force can be obtained. For this measurement, the particle is at the edge of the trap, away from the region near the equilbrium position where the trap can be described as a linear spring. This method provides the ability to measure higher forces for the same beam power, compared with using the linear region of the trap, with lower risk of optical damage to trapped specimens. Calibration is typically performed by using an increasing fluid flow to exert an increasing force on a trapped particle until it escapes. In this calibration technique, the particle is usually assumed to escape along a straight line in the direction of fluid-flow. Here, we show that the particle instead follows a curved trajectory, which depends on the rate of application of the force (i.e., the acceleration of the fluid flow). In the limit of very low acceleration, the particle follows the surface of zero axial optical force during the escape. The force required to produce escape depends on the trajectory, and hence the acceleration. This can result in variations in the escape force of a factor of two. This can have a major impact on calibration to determine the escape force efficiency. Even when calibration measurements are all performed in the low acceleration regime, variations in the escape force efficiency of 20% or more can still occur. We present computational simulations using generalized Lorenz-Mie theory and experimental measurements to show how the escape force efficiency depends on rate of increase of force and trapping power, and discuss the impact on calibration.

Highlights

  • Since the development of optical tweezers [1], there has been widespread application of noncontact trapping and manipulation in biology and other fields

  • The optical forces experienced by the particle along each trajectory are different due to the time it takes for the particle to reach dynamic equilibrium with the changing forces

  • Calibration by determining the spring constant at the equilibrium position is not even approximately accurate for escape force estimates, nor is it sufficient to calibrate the forces in a static external force field if practical measurements involve time dependent external forces

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since the development of optical tweezers [1], there has been widespread application of noncontact trapping and manipulation in biology and other fields. If the particle remains close enough to the equilibrium position in the trap (region A of the force–position curve in Fig. 1), the trap can be treated as a Hookean (i.e., linear) spring In this case, the calibration consists of determining the spring constant of the trap, and it is not necessary to determine the entire force–position curve. Various well-established methods are available for this task [4,5,6,7] This ease of calibration is a major factor in the popularity of restricting force measurements to the linear region of the trap

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call