Abstract

Visuospatial working memory (VSWM) involves cortical regions along the dorsal visual pathway, which are topographically organized with respect to the visual space. However, it remains unclear how such functional organization may constrain VSWM behavior across space and time. Here, we systematically mapped VSWM performance across the 2-dimensional (2D) space in various retention intervals in human subjects using the memory-guided and visually guided saccade tasks in two experiments. Relative to visually guided saccades, memory-guided saccades showed significant increases in unsystematic errors, or response variability, with increasing target eccentricity (3°–13° of visual angle). Unsystematic errors also increased with increasing delay (1.5–3 s, Experiment 1; 0.5–5 s, Experiment 2), while there was little or no interaction between delay and eccentricity. Continuous bump attractor modeling suggested neurophysiological and functional organization factors in the increasing unsystematic errors in VSWM across space and time. These findings indicate that: (1) VSWM representation may be limited by the functional topology of the visual pathway for the 2D space; (2) Unsystematic errors may reflect accumulated noise from memory maintenance while systematic errors may originate from non-mnemonic processes such as noisy sensorimotor transformation; (3) There may be independent mechanisms supporting the spatial and temporal processing of VSWM.

Highlights

  • Visuospatial working memory (VSWM) involves cortical regions along the dorsal visual pathway, which are topographically organized with respect to the visual space

  • Additional analyses revealed that the unsystematic errors significantly increased with increasing eccentricity linearly and quadratically in the memory-guided saccade (MGS), but only linearly in the visually guided saccade (VGS)

  • We investigated how VSWM representation varies across 2D space and time

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Visuospatial working memory (VSWM) involves cortical regions along the dorsal visual pathway, which are topographically organized with respect to the visual space It remains unclear how such functional organization may constrain VSWM behavior across space and time. Previous behavioral studies of humans and macaques have found that VSWM performance during a delayed response task varies across spatial locations. Studies using an oculomotor delayed-response ­paradigm[5] in macaques showed that saccades to remembered locations exhibit a systematic upward bias, with saccade endpoints systematically displaced above the ­target[6,7,8] These studies report that both systematic and unsystematic errors vary across space and that these errors seem to increase with increasing e­ ccentricity[6,7,8]. VSWM performances, reflected by both mean and variability of responses, may be less accurate for peripheral targets, as the cortical

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call