Abstract
This paper disproves several results pertaining to database concurrency control that are claimed in [8]. The results we disprove are•theorems 3.1, 3.2, 3.6 -- which claim a polynomial time algorithm for testing whether transaction schedules are serializable, and•theorems 4.2 and 4.7 -- which claim a necessary and sufficient mechanism for preserving the "weak consistency" of databases.In addition, we demonstrate that the notion of "weak consistency" introduced in [8] admits database states that are strictly inconsistent.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
