Abstract

An article published in the New England Journal of Medicine focuses on personal responsibility for medical error, suggesting that restoring the balance between personal accountability and a ?noblame? system is the key factor in eliminating medical error [1]. The authors of this article write as if there has been a ?no-blame? system in place and that it is now time to reinstitute personal responsibility. We believe the opposite has been true. The current medical culture of blame, malpractice and reactionary punishment?all of which are based on the idea that one human or a team of humans is responsible for an error?has been in place for decades and has failed to improve safety [2]. The concept of personal responsibility and liability has been in place from before the IOM report on medical error in 1999 and things have not changed [3].

Highlights

  • An article published in the New England Journal of Medicine focuses on personal responsibility for medical error, suggesting that restoring the balance between personal accountability and a “noblame” system is the key factor in eliminating medical error [1]

  • The current medical culture of blame, malpractice and reactionary punishment—all of which are based on the idea that one human or a team of humans is responsible for an error—has been in place for decades and has failed to improve safety [2]

  • To encourage error reporting further, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) “...has chosen to waive fines and penalties, subject to certain limitations, for unintentional violations of federal aviation statutes and regulations which are reported to Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS) [8].”

Read more

Summary

Introduction

An article published in the New England Journal of Medicine focuses on personal responsibility for medical error, suggesting that restoring the balance between personal accountability and a “noblame” system is the key factor in eliminating medical error [1]. The current medical culture of blame, malpractice and reactionary punishment—all of which are based on the idea that one human or a team of humans is responsible for an error—has been in place for decades and has failed to improve safety [2].

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.