Error pattern and item order on Halstead's Speech Sounds Perception Test.

Abstract

Examined the possibility that the previously reported pattern of errors on the Speech Sounds Perception Test could be explained on the basis of learning (N = 30). This possibility was examined by altering the order of presentation of subtests so that the series with the highest mean error scores in the previous study were moved to the positions in which fewest errors had been observed previously. It was found that in spite of the alteration of order of presentation, the subtests that had the greatest number of errors in the previous study again had the largest mean errors. Conversely, the subtests with the lowest mean errors previously again had the lowest mean errors. It was concluded that order of administration did not influence the number of errors on each subtest and that therefore the observed pattern could not be explained on the basis of learning. Further data were presented that suggested a relationship between the mean number of errors on each subtest and the number of items in each subtest with correct choices that were phonetically similar to real words.