Abstract

Electrocatalysis holds the key to the decentralized production of hydrogen peroxide via the two-electron oxygen reduction reaction (ORR, O2g+2H++e-→H2O2aq). However, cost-effective, active, and selective catalysts are still sought after. While density functional theory (DFT) has already led to the discovery of various enhanced catalysts, it has a severe yet often unnoticed drawback: the ill description of O2 and H2O2. Here, we analyze the impact of the errors in those two species on the most widespread activity plots in the literature, namely free-energy diagrams and Sabatier-type volcano plots. Uncorrected or partially corrected gas-phase energies lead to appreciably different activity plots that may provide inaccurate predictions. Indeed, we show for a variety of electrocatalysts that only when the errors in O2 and H2O2 are corrected can DFT mimic the experiments. In sum, this work provides concrete guidelines to avoid a common pitfall of computational models for electrocatalytic hydrogen peroxide production.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.