Error Analysis on the Five Stand Biomass Growth Estimation Methods for a Sub-Alpine Natural Pine Forest in Yunnan, Southwestern China

Abstract

Forest biomass measurement or estimation is critical for forest monitoring at the stand scale, but errors among different estimations in stand investigation are unclear. Thus, the Pinus densata natural forest in Shangri-La City, southwestern China, was selected as the research object to investigate the biomass of 84 plots and 100 samples of P. densata. The stand biomass was calculated using five methods: stand biomass growth with age (SBA), stem biomass combined with the biomass expansion factors (SB+BEF), stand volume combined with biomass conversion and expansion factors (SV+BCEF), individual tree biomass combined with stand diameter structure (IB+SDS), and individual tree biomass combined with stand density (IB+SD). The estimation errors of the five methods were then analyzed. The results showed that the suitable methods for estimating stand biomass are SB+BEF, M+BCEF, and IB+SDS. When using these three methods (SB+BEF, SV+BCEF, and IB+SDS) to estimate the biomass of different components, wood biomass estimation using SB+BEF is unsuitable, and root biomass estimation employing the IB+SDS method was not preferred. The SV+BCEF method was better for biomass estimation. Except for the branches, the mean relative error (MRE) of the other components presented minor errors in the estimation, while MRE was lower than other components in the range from −0.11%–28.93%. The SB+BEF was more appealing for branches biomass estimation, and its MRE is only 0.31% lower than SV+BCEF. The stand biomass strongly correlated with BEF, BCEF, stand structure, stand age, and other factors. Hence, the stand biomass growth model system established in this study effectively predicted the stand biomass dynamics and provided a theoretical basis and practical support for accurately estimating forest biomass growth.