Abstract
We analyze and compare the errors of two numerical approaches for measuring compensated income. We prove that Vartia's algorithm and Breslaw and Smith's algorithm both converge quadratically; when the price change within each partition step is small, the error of Vartia's algorithm is approximately half that of Breslaw and Smith's algorithm. A theorem and the appropriate simulations with three different demand systems correct the existing error analysis of the two algorithms, and demonstrate that Vartia's algorithm is more accurate than Breslaw and Smith's.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
