Abstract
Abstract The recognition of indigenous peoples’ right to participate in decision-making is one of the most important developments in international law, enabling them to use their knowledge and influence the adoption of measures that could affect them. However, due to a narrow approach to indigenous participation, states often disregard this knowledge, thus moving forward without having full certainty about potential effects on indigenous peoples’ environment and livelihood. In this context, there is a role for the precautionary principle, by which states must avoid the materialisation of non-negligible harm in situations of scientific uncertainty. Yet, this principle has been shaped by a conventional understanding of ‘science’, inadequate to deal with these risks and uncertainties involving socio-cultural aspects beyond conventional sciences. Considering this, I argue that the adoption of effective precautionary measures requires relying on another relevant form of knowledge, traditional knowledge, expanding this notion of ‘science’ and strengthening indigenous peoples’ participatory rights.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
