Abstract
A misprint crept into my review of Sven Steinmo's Taxation and Democracy: Swedish, British and American Approaches to Financing the Modem State (AHR, 100 [June 1995]: 879) that changes my meaning. The third sentence of the review as printed reads, “The United States has a ‘fragmented’ structure, Sweden a ‘corporatist’ structure, and Britain a parliamentary structure, and each system provides the government with near dictatorial but temporary power.” What I wrote was “… and Britain a parliamentary structure which provides the government with near dictatorial but temporary power.” In other words, the clause about near dictatorial but temporary power applied only to Britain, not the other two. This is what I and Sven Steinmo meant.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
