Abstract
Clinical Physiology and Functional ImagingVolume 40, Issue 2 p. 139-139 ErratumFree Access Erratum This article corrects the following: Artificial intelligence-based versus manual assessment of prostate cancer in the prostate gland: a method comparison study Mike A. Mortensen, Pablo Borrelli, Mads Hvid Poulsen, Oke Gerke, Olof Enqvist, Johannes Ulén, Elin Trägårdh, Caius Constantinescu, Lars Edenbrandt, Lars Lund, Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen, Volume 39Issue 6Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging pages: 399-406 First Published online: September 8, 2019 First published: 03 February 2020 https://doi.org/10.1111/cpf.12617AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL In Mortensen et al. (2019), the figure citations and caption have been updated. Here are the updated figure captions for Figures 3, 4 and 5: Figure 3: Graphical output of the CNN showing CT sequence (upper left figure), PET sequence (lower left figure), PET/CT fusion (upper right figure) and CNN output (lower right figure) with the segmented prostate (green) and tumour (red). Figure 4: Bland–Altman difference plots of weight and automated prostate volume estimate plotted against the mean of the two methods. The purple line indicates the mean of the differences whereas the red lines indicate the upper and lower limits of agreement (BA LoA). Figure 5: Bland–Altman difference plots of SUVmax, SUVmean, Volabn and TLU plotted against the mean of the two methods. The purple line indicates the mean of the differences whereas the red lines indicate the upper and lower limits of agreement (BA LoA). The online version of the article has been corrected. We would like to apologize for the inconvenience caused. Reference Mortensen, M. A., Borrelli,P., Poulsen, M. H., Gerke, O., Enqvist, O., Ulén, J., … Høilund-Carlsen, P. F. (2019) Artificial intelligence-based versus manual assessment of prostate cancer in the prostate gland: a method comparison study. Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging, 39, 399– 406. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpf.12592. Volume40, Issue2March 2020Pages 139-139 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
