Abstract
On the very last line of page 1022, “MEQ score” should read instead, “MEQ category.” Vitale, J. A., Calogiuri, G., & Weydahl, A. (2013) Influence of chronotype on responses to a standardized, self-paced walking task in the morning vs afternoon: a pilot study. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 116, 3, 1020–1028. DOI: 10.2466/06.19.PMS.116.3.1020-1028 The last lines on page 1023 should read: “This was confirmed by MANOVA, which did show a main effect for chronotype (MEQ category, p = .04) with a fairly high effect size and adequate power (partial η2 = 0.16; estimated power = 0.76). Cohen's d values for evening types vs morning types in the morning test were −0.06, −0.90, and 1.65 for ‘time for completion,’ ‘HRmean,’ and RPE,’ respectively. Including an experimental condition in the study design (i.e., walking test later in the evening) could lead to an inversion of the psychophysiological response in favor of the individuals with Evening preference.”
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
