Abstract
[This corrects the article on p. 1273 in vol. 10, PMID: 30891345.].
Highlights
Our second error was in assuming that the polarization matrices that we originally obtained from Ref. 2 were correct
The matrices representing the retardances induced by the Nomarski prisms, N1 and N2, were given by Ishiwata et al as ei π (ξ ∆+θ )/2 N1 =
Received 10 May 2019; published 23 May 2019. When these revised forms for the polarization matrices are inserted into the equation for the transmission cross-coefficient R, we obtain
Summary
Our second error was in assuming that the polarization matrices that we originally obtained from Ref. 2 were correct. It is obvious that they cannot be. Ref. 2 gives the Jones matrices for a 45◦ linear polarizer as 20 √, which represents an ND filter rather than a polarizer.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
