Erratum: Validation of Elk resource selection models with spatially independent data

Abstract

Coe, P. K., B. K. Johnson, M. J. Wisdom, J. G. Cook, M. Vavra, and R. M. Nielson. 2011. Validation of Elk Resource Selection Models with Spatially Independent Data. Journal of Wildlife Management 75:159–170 In this article, 90% confidence interval bars for Sled Springs in Figures 4 and 5 were incorrect. The correct Figures 4 and 5 can be found below. The authors regret the error. Comparison of elk resource selection function model coefficients from standardized covariates for top performing models developed at Starkey Experimental Forest and Range, Oregon, USA 1993–1996 and validated at Sled Springs, Oregon, USA, 2003–2005. Circles (Starkey) and triangles (Sled Springs) represent model coefficients and error bars represent 90% confidence intervals. Distance is abbreviated as “D.” in x-axis labels. Comparison of elk resource selection function model coefficients from standardized covariates for poor performing models developed at Starkey Experimental Forest and Range, Oregon, USA 1993–1996 and validated at Sled Springs, Oregon, USA, 2003–2005. Circles (Starkey) and triangles (Sled Springs) represent model coefficients and error bars represent 90% confidence intervals. Distance is abbreviated as “D.” in x-axis labels. Elk were hunted at Sled Springs during the mid-fall observation period.