Abstract
Figures 1, 2, 4, and 5 of the original paper are incorrect, and might frustrate any attempt to reproduce our results. These figures were obtained using an incorrect value of the refractive index for the amorphous carbon grains, different from the one quoted (K.-W. Suh, MNRAS, 315, 740 [2000]). Although the energy density distribution calculated with the correct refractive index is numerically different from the one reported, the conclusions of the paper are unchanged. We thank Harald Mutschke of the Friedrich Schiller University Jena, for calling our attention to this point.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
