Abstract

In the above-mentioned article, the efficiency rates in Table 2 are wrong. The correct efficiency rates should be: On p. 55, the efficiency rate in ‘‘Efficiency was 74.8 %, the highest value for all possible cut points’’ is incorrect. It should be replaced by: ‘‘Efficiency was 69.2 %, the highest value for all possible cut points.’’ On p. 55, the efficiency rate in ‘‘At cut point 9, efficiency was 57.9 %’’ is incorrect. It should be replaced by: ‘‘At cut point 9, efficiency was 59.8 %.’’ On p. 56, the efficiency rate in ‘‘Maximum specificity (78.6 %), and efficiency (74.8 %),....’’ is incorrect. It should be replaced by: ‘‘Maximum specificity (78.6 %), and efficiency (69.2 %), ...’’. PHQ15 C 6 PHQ15 C 7 PHQ15 C 8 PHQ15 C 9 PHQ15 C 10 PHQ15 C 11

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.