Abstract
The publisher regrets the title of this article was incorrectly published and should be ‘Risk of shortening in operatively treated proximal femur fractures with cephalomedullary nails with dynamically versus statically locked helical blades.’ In addition to this, 'statically' was incorrectly spelt as 'statistically' in several places within this paper. The publisher would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. Risk of shortening in operatively treated proximal femur fractures with cephalomedullary nails with dynamically versus statically locked helical bladesInjuryVol. 54Issue 2PreviewCephalomedullary nails (CMN) have proven to be effective for the fixation of unstable pertrochanteric hip fractures, but limited data exists regarding the degree of shortening that occurs with nailing systems that offer “dynamically” versus “statically” locked helical blades. This study aimed to determine the incidence, timing, and amount of postoperative fracture shortening in patients with pertrochanteric hip fractures treated with “dynamically” versus “statically” locked helical blades. Full-Text PDF
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
