Abstract
Although this paper circulated as a preprint for 12 years, an error in the argument for the Capelli identity went unnoticed until Professor M. Wakayama read the paper in order to review it. I thank him for his care and for bringing this error to my attention. The error occurs on page 566. The result at issue, that det II is central in '/(gyn), is true (and classical) and the general line of argument is sufficient to prove it, but the details of the computation are described incorrectly. The identity on line 3, page 566 is correct, but the description of the calculation drawn from it is not. Instead of terms of the form
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
