Abstract
We correct an error in the implementation of the NNLO corrections, which modifies the numerical predictions. In the light of these modifications, we re-assess the kinematical range of applicability of the fixed-order NNLO predictions.
Highlights
These figures span the range from large values of φ∗η, where we observe that the NNLO prediction provides an excellent description of the data, towards the onset of deviations from the fixed order predictions, which is seen at different values of φ∗η in the three invariant mass bins
In [1], we investigated the relation between pZT and φ∗η both from the purely kinematical point of view (Section 2) as well as by inspecting the leading logarithmic terms in this limit (Section 3.4)
The pZT range is fixed to [0, 20] GeV, while the φ∗η range is chosen according to the above equation for each mass bin, using the central value of m
Summary
JHEP10(2018)126 (1/σ) dσ / dpZT Ratio to NLO These figures span the range from large values of φ∗η, where we observe that the NNLO prediction provides an excellent description of the data, towards the onset of deviations from the fixed order predictions, which is seen at different values of φ∗η in the three invariant mass bins. To the pZT distribution, we observe that the corrected distributions deviate from the data at somewhat larger values of φ∗η than initially seen in [1].
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
