Abstract

The text in the original publication following equation (16) reads “. . . λ = 0.39 was computed using Eq. 15 with a and b = c determined as 0.90D and 0.62D, respectively, . . .”, but it should have been rendered as “. . . λ = 0.77 was computed using Eq. 15 with a and b = c determined as 0.62D and 0.90D, respectively, . . .”. As a consequence of transposing the values of the major and minor semi-axes in the ellipsoidal model, the computed value of IA/IT for an ellipsoidal ring (namely 0.23) was too low. The correct value is 0.45, which is only 5% greater than the value of 0.43 determined from the results in Fig. 11. The authors apologize to the readers for this error and would like to thank Dr. Robert Whittlesey for bringing this to their attention.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.