Abstract

As in [1, Section 2], the proof of this theorem reduces to the case where (R,m) is a complete local normal integral domain and I is principal. However, contrary to the claims in [1], we may not assume that I is a radical ideal. In fact, Theorems 2.7 and 2.8 should be cut out of [1]. The following is a slight (and needed) generalization of [1, Theorem 3.9]. The proof here is essentially the same as the one in [1], only more direct.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.