Abstract

In the proof of the implication (c) =⇒ (a) of Theorem 11 we state that P ∈ PW( E; F ) since P = Q ◦ R with R ∈ W(E; G), Q ∈ P(G; F ) and G Banach. But since PL[W] is not contained in PW (see, e.g., example 27 in G. Botelho: Ideals of polynomials generated by weakly compact operators, Note Mat. 25 (2006), 69–102) this conclusion is not true in general. So the given proof of this implication is not true. The proof of Theorem 11 can be completed as follows: (c) =⇒ (a): By following the pattern of the proof of Lemma 9, having the equality P[W]( E; F ) = PL[W]( E; F ) in mind, one can prove that if P(E; F ) = P[W](E; F ) τc for every Banach space F and for some m ∈ N then, L(E; F ) = W(E; F ) τc for every Banach space F . This shows that E has the WCAP.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.