Abstract
Erratum to: ann. behav. med.DOI 10.1007/s12160-011-9308-7In “Health Message Framing Effects on Attitudes, Inten-tions, and Behaviors: A Meta-Analytic Review,” (Volume43, Number 1, February 2012, pp. 101–116, doi:10.1007/s12160-011-9308-7) the effect size for Rothman et al. (1993[70]) study 2 should be reported as r0.06 (95 % CI0−.15,.23) in Table 1. The summary effect size for the 2 studies ofskin cancer prevention behavior should be reported as mar-ginally significant, r0.15 (p0.054; 95 % CI0−.00, .289) inTable 3 and on p. 109. The meta-analysis’ main finding ofan overall effect size for framing on prevention behaviorremains significant, and should be reported asr0.075(p0.003; 95 % CI0.03, .13) in Table 2 and on pp. 101,109, and 111; the fail-safe N for this finding is 166 (p. 110).All other findings remain unchanged.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
