Abstract
The paper contains an error which necessitates some revisions to the proof of our main result, Theorem 1.2. In fact, the polynomial functions Dα ∈ C[a∗] (α ∈ ), discussed in Section 2.2, need not, in general, be invariant under the little Weyl group W◦ as stated. One needs to introduce a “ -shift” (half the sum of the positive roots) to achieve W◦-invariance. Thismeans that although top( Dα) ∈ C[a∗]W◦ , the polynomial Dα itself need not lie in the image of the mapping ρ given in Eqs. 2.1 and 2.3. Thus, we cannot define polynomials Eα ∈ C[VR]K as in Definition 2.1 or obtain the related functions eL ∈ C(h∗V )K as claimed in Proposition 4.2. Lemma A.2 below provides a technical tool needed to revise the proof for Theorem 1.2. First, we require the following substitute for Lemma 2.7 from the paper. Lemma A.1 For a well-behaved multiplicity free action K :V and α, β ∈ one has
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.