Abstract
There was a mistake in the normalization of the histograms representing the differenial cross section as a function of the azimuthal angle between the jets: figure 3 left and figure 4 left in the original paper [1].
Highlights
The mistake affects only the absolute predicted cross section
There was a mistake in the normalization of the histograms representing the differenial cross section as a function of the azimuthal angle between the jets: figure 3 left and figure 4 left in the original paper [1]
The current cross section is in agreement with earlier calculation [2], which was done within the simplified model (‘HEF’ in [1]) and similar kinematic cuts
Summary
The mistake affects only the absolute predicted cross section. The current cross section is in agreement with earlier calculation [2], which was done within the simplified model (‘HEF’ in [1]) and similar (but not exactly the same) kinematic cuts. There was a mistake in the normalization of the histograms representing the differenial cross section as a function of the azimuthal angle between the jets: figure 3 left and figure 4 left in the original paper [1].
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
