Abstract
and not as given. Though the main essence stays unimpaired, the leading constant in the main quantities in this paper were effected as a result of the mistake made; in particular the leading constant for the nodal length variance is consistent with Berry’s prediction (taking into account the symmetry of the spherical nodal lines), unlike what is claimed in the original version of the manuscript. That is, the original claim of Theorem 1.1,
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have