Abstract
The original version of this article, unfortunately, contained an error. In the “Results” section of the above article originally published with an error. Originally reading “...significant lack of fit (test statistic = 144.83, p = 0.29)”, this should instead have read “...significant lack of fit “( $$ \widehat{\boldsymbol{c}}=\mathbf{0.95} $$ ; Test statistic = 144.83, p = 0.29)”.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
