Abstract
No abstract
Highlights
Erratum There is an inconsistency between the sample size quoted in the Methods section and that presented in Additional file 1 [1]
The number quoted in the Methods of 10,455 individuals (5,762 males and 4,693 females) is incorrect
This figure relates to our full database, which includes some individuals shot beyond the boundaries of the areas focused on in this study
Summary
Erratum There is an inconsistency between the sample size quoted in the Methods section and that presented in Additional file 1 [1].
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
