Abstract
In <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">[1, Fig. 5]</xref> , the assumed atmospheric conditions were incorrectly stated for the curve showing the millimeter-wave propagation model of excess attenuation at frequencies with respect to 193 GHz. Rather than being for 91% relative humidity (RH) and 289 K, as was stated in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">[1]</xref> , the model curve in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">[1, Fig. 5]</xref> was for 50% RH and 289 K. (The experimental measurements are unaffected.) The figure is reproduced here as <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Fig. 1(a)</xref> , now with correct labeling.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
