Abstract

There are two problems in the paper “An empirical central limit theorem for intermittent maps” published in Probability Theory and Related Fields (2010) 148:177-195. First, the definition of the coefficient β2(n) is in fact too restrictive. Secondly, there is a wrong argument in the proof of the main result, Theorem 2.1. In this erratum, we give the correct definition of the coefficient β2(n), as it was introduced in Dedecker and Prieur (2007), and we explain how to fix the proof of Theorem 2.1. The first paragraph is devoted to the definition of the coefficients. In the second paragraph, we give a slightly more general Rosenthal-type inequality than that given in Proposition 3.1, which will be used to fix the proof of Theorem 2.1. In the third paragraph, we explain the changes in the proof of Theorem 2.1.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.