Abstract
p(x) < +(x) + c' for all x E X. is not valid in full generality. However, the statement itself holds in the general form. A proof is in [2]. Since that proof is quite cumbersome, it should be of interest to show how the proof in [1] can easily be repaired. This modified proof is valid also in the case when F is not a G0-set. Replace the paragraph on p. 342 of [1] from line 14 from bottom to line 5 from bottom by the following: We define an upper semicontinuous function 4 on X by
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
