Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3892/ol.2019.11011.].
Highlights
To the publication of the above article, it has been noted that the article was erroneously classified as a ‘Review’ on the Journal's website and in Web of Science [as denoted by the inclusion of “(Review)” at the end of the title]. This retrospective analysis of 89 cases of peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumors does include a review of the literature, the article, in itself, is not a review‐type article
This error in the classification of the article type occurred during the pre‐press stages
All the authors agree to this Erratum, and the Editor apologizes to the authors for the inconvenience caused
Summary
To the publication of the above article, it has been noted that the article was erroneously classified as a ‘Review’ on the Journal's website and in Web of Science [as denoted by the inclusion of “(Review)” at the end of the title].
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
