Abstract
Erratum| June 01 2001 Erratum - June 2001 Pediatrics (2001) 107 (6): 1450. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.107.6.1450 Connected Content This is a correction to: Prenatal Treatment of Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia: Author Differs With Technical Report Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Erratum - June 2001. Pediatrics June 2001; 107 (6): 1450. 10.1542/peds.107.6.1450 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All PublicationsAll JournalsPediatricsHospital PediatricsPediatrics In ReviewNeoReviewsAAP Grand RoundsAAP NewsAll AAP Sites Search Advanced Search Subjects: For Your Benefit Topics: memory, prenatal care, thalidomide, congenital adrenal hyperplasia, dexamethasone, diethylstilbestrol An editing error occurred in a response to a letter to the editor that appeared in the April 2001 issue of Pediatricsentitled “Prenatal Treatment of Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia: Author Differs With Technical Report.” On page 805, the last sentence of the reply by Frias et al reads: The memory of the tragedies associated with prenatal use of dexamethasone and thalidomide demands no less. That sentence should read: The memory of the tragedies associated with prenatal use of DES (diethylstilbestrol) and thalidomide demands no less. View Original Article You do not currently have access to this content.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
