Abstract
Erratum: Global polarization of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi></mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math> hyperons in Pb-Pb collisions at <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.76</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math> and 5.02 TeV [Phys. Rev. C <b>101</b> , 044611 (2020)
Highlights
= 2.76 and 5.02 TeV shown in Figs. 3–5 and Table II are updated with the opposite sign
Neither of the changes above alter the conclusion of the published paper, that the average and polarization for the 15–50% centrality range at the two collision energies is consistent with zero, PH (%) ≈ −0.01 ± 0.05(stat.) ± 0.03(syst.)
The systematic uncertainties are shown as shaded boxes
Summary
(Received 26 September 2021; published 8 February 2022) The correct version of Eq (3) in the paper for PH is ΑH is the / decay parameter, RP is the reaction plane angle, and φp∗ is the azimuthal angle of the decay proton’s momentum in the rest frame.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.