Abstract

We would like to draw your attention to an error in our recent publication. Gamma passing rate values reported in Table are not correct due to an error on the authors side while preparing the final files for publication after the article was accepted. The correct values are shown in the table below, which replaces Table in the original paper. We are grateful to Dr. Thierry Mertens for pointing out this error. Gamma passing rates for the intercomparison of 2kLIC measurements [raw data (RD), relative pixel response correction (RP), and RP and anisotropy correction (RP+AC)] and TPS calculations for Case 4 (Table presented.).

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.