Abstract
We correct some errors and give some more research for our paper published in Survey Review, 2016, 48(351), 385–391. This note is a correction owing to the use of the questionable surface meteorological measurements of the International GNSS Service (IGS) and also gives more sufficient studies to validate our method due to our inadequate study. Numerical weather model values of surface meteorological data were used to check the IGS surface meteorological measurements and long-time zenith tropospheric delay values at 76 radiosonde stations in Russia and near Russia were added as test data. Revised, updated and additional results were shown and analysed, which provide more evidence to show that the new proposed ISAAS model has a better accuracy than the Saastamoinen in Russia.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
