Abstract
In the report "Activation and regeneration of rhodopsin in the insect visual cycle" by A. Kiselev and S. Subramaniam (25 Nov., p. 1369), the second and third sentences of the last paragraph on page 1371 were incorrectly printed. They should have read, "When rhodopsin was re-excited immediately after it was regenerated, most of the metarhodopsin formed was thermally stable (that is, M(b) was formed predominantly; Fig. 4A). However, when rhodopsin was re-examined after waiting for various lengths of time (in the dark), an exponential increase was observed in the amount of thermally unstable metarhodopsin produced, implying heterogeneity in the rhodopsin population."
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
